Apples are different from Onions. But both have a ball form, so why can't we compare them? Well every child will tell you, you can't, they are different. Still in TA we all have done it at times. Place two oscillators within one Window and see the Holy Grail. The crosses of these two oscillators look great, let's trade them
Here you see the TRIX oscillator against the Ergodic within 1 subwindow
That's not too bad on a first look. Unfortunately these 2 Oscillators have nothing in common. One is an apple, the other an onion. To compare 2 Oscillators, the least you need to do is making sure that both oscillators have the same range.
EG: Both have swings from 0 to 100
But the TRIX and the Ergodic are calculated from price and are not normalized. Meaning the value range these 2 Oscillators swing in, is not fixed.
But there is a way to compare Apples and Onions! Just make them comparable. And the tool to do that is the Stochastic Oscillator. The Stochastic Oscillator normally uses the Close Price as input and it tells you where that close price is relative to the range of the last # bars.
EG: A Stochastic 14,1,1 takes the range of the last 14 bars and tells you where the last price is within that range on a percentage scale from 0 to 100% (0% being the low and 100% being the high of that range)
Now we know that any oscillator swings. Even when prices trend an oscillator tends to go flat. What we don't know with not normalized oscillators like the Ergodic or the Trix oscillator is the range these oscillators swing in. Still there is a way to change that. Ensign Software allows me to plot a Stochastic Indicator which uses not the Close Price but the Ergodic Oscillator Value as Input.
Use a very long range (as seen above I use a 400 bar range) and you will cover the relevant range the Ergodic moved in for the last few hours or days depending on your timeframe. The Stochastic will still be very sensitive, as the return value is the exact percentage value, where the current Ergodic value is within the range of the last 400 bars. Do the same with the Trix value and you get something very similar but not identical to the chart I showed above.
As you can see, while the arbitrary placing of the 2 oscillators within 1 window gives you a cross of both lines on the last bar, the placement within a fixed range of 0 to 100 and the correct placement of each oscillator within it's own range shows you no cross to the downside took place on the lbar prior to the last bar.
I can't tell you, if it makes any sense at all to trade crosses of the Ergodic with the Trix oscillator or slings of one oscillator against the other. The reason I wrote this article was to show you (and myself) a way to make apples comparable with onions, by placing them both within a common frame and then doing the comparison.